Tag: Azure

PERTH IS LOVELY TO VISIT, BUT IT’S NOT CLOUDY: SD-WAN TO THE RESCU

On February 19, my colleague Edward Haletky wrote a piece on scale. In it, he highlights that scale is not just about 20,000 desktops and 3,000 virtual hosts. Rather, there are many other metrics that could and should be considered with regard to scale.

I am currently living in Perth in Western Australia. Perth holds a rather dubious record in that is it is the most remote capital city in the world. “Wait, Canberra is the capital of Australia,” you might say, and you would be correct. However, Australia operates in a federal manner and is made up of states and territories, and Perth is the capital of Western Australia. Why am I saying all this? One word, really: cloud. Living in Perth, our nearest AWSAzure, and GCP zones are in Sydney, 3,300 kilometers (2,000 miles) away on the east coast. Oracle Cloud? Again, Sydney. OVH? Yes, Sydney. Softlayer? Wait, it has a zone in Melbourne, but that is still 2,700 kilometers (1,700 miles) from Perth. As you can see, we are quite isolated. Physics rather than doctrine limits Perth’s access to public cloud.

Previously Published on TVP Strategy (The Virtualization Practice)

—– Read More —–

Managing a Multicloud

There is no denying that the future of cloud is not just with a single provider, capable as AzureAWS and the other public providers are. For true data protection, your information needs to be in three separate locations, and with the rise of data sovereignty, there is a need for data to be kept within the boundaries of a nation-state. GDPR will place other obligations on companies and their data compliance. Smaller countries will suffer more than larger ones, with their multiple regions and zones per country per cloud provider. Smaller countries like the UK will have problems, as a single provider will not have three regions for true resiliency. Microsoft, for example, will have two regions in the UK for Azure (London and Cardiff) and two for Office 365 (Durham and London). Amazon will only have a single AWS zone: London. (Europe retains Frankfurt, Ireland, and Paris.) The other public cloud providers do not fare much better. Post-GDPR, data sovereignty will be front and center. So, what exactly can you do if you want, need, or desire to be totally in the public cloud: sell your customers in Europe and the world and not fall foul of transnational data-protection laws? A multicloud may be the answer.

Multicloud Puppet Master

Let’s look quickly at the main market providers: India, China, and the US. How they can remain compliant?

Previously Published on TVP Strategy (The Virtualization Practice)

—– Read More —–

AWS Leads by a furlong, but Azure is Rapidly gaining ground

At the time of this writing (in early April), one of the biggest days in the UK horseracing calendar, Aintree’s Grand National Day, was upcoming. This seemed to me prophetic, as people often state that AWS is the leader in a one-horse race. Historically, yes, it has often appeared to be in a one-horse race, smashing competitors left, right, and center—first humiliating VMware, the godparent of the cloud, by beating it at its own game, then by crushing other, more traditional companies’ cloud aspirations without thought.

Many believed this battle, if not the war, had been well and truly won and that AWS was the victor. It had even clipped the wings of Google.

———————- Read More ——

Moving home and troublesome files: issue with cross-cloud

You may or may not be aware that I have just moved house, and, me being me, I have not done it by halves. My family and I up’d sticks to the other side of the world, and we landed in Perth—not Scotland, but Australia. Call it a cross-cloud migration; this obviously was fraught with difficulties and did not go as smoothly as planned. This has got me thinking about moving home in a cloud environment, whether from site to site, region to region, or cloud provider to cloud provider. In a perfect world, this should be as simple as live migration is today between like-minded virtualization hosts: VMware to VMware, Hyper-V to Hyper-V. The unfortunate truth is that this is not the case

.——————– Read More ————

Has AWS Peaked

There can be no real arguing against the fact that Amazon Web Services reigns supreme with regard to public cloud. Its recently announced quarterly results show that AWS is not only gaining revenue, but actually making a “small” surplus. OK, maybe not so small: a tad over half a billion dollars, compared to a $57 million loss for the same quarter in 2015.

What I have found interesting whilst watching it grow is how much like VMware it has become. I can hear you all saying, “It is nothing like VMware.” But please hear me out. AWS’s growth cycle is very similar. Why do I say this?

AWS has become the de facto leader in public cloud in a manner similar to the way VMware dominated the on-premises data center after 2004. Like VMware, AWS has delivered on the early mover advantage. This does not mean that it will continue to dominate, but more on that later.

to Continue Reading